Canadian Multiculturalism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Canadian Multiculturalism - Essay Example The emphasis that we look upon the theoretical foundations is of the policies instead of focusing on their historical roots. Another important theory and policy would be that of Interculturalism which involves the acceptance of a multicultural fact and tries to effectively exist in a society thus promoting dialogue and interaction between cultures (Garcea et al, 2008). The constant criticism it has brought forth of the existing policies of multiculturalism and maintains the ideology that multiculturalism failed to include different cultures within our society, and instead it has divided society and has isolated and accentuated their specificity e. g. Quà ©bec. The question that arises in particular; Is Canadian Multiculturalism the same as it was before? Therefore, the primary goal of this paper is to outline multicultural policies in Canada in an historical context. Thus this will relate to the change from the ‘new nationalism’ to a philosophy of multiculturalism as the basis of the national identities of English-speaking Canada. Afterwards, this paper will dive into the exploration of the issues ensuing Quà ©bec’s Interculturalism and its discriminatory rights and religious persecution of immigration. The change in context influences the government’s policies towards migrants, which integration to a multicultural policy is the basis of the approach in Canada. Looking further at some benefits of multiculturalism, the policies that it encourages migrants to be able to retain their culture thus benefitting a new national culture in Canada.

Religion in the Workplace Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Religion in the Workplace - Essay Example Utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory, which states that a sign of the correctness of our actions is a manifestation of the greatest good for the greatest number of people. So the person making the moral choice should look not only for own welfare but also for the welfare of the others.He believed that the anonymous social forces are the decisive factors of how people live. He explained people’s lifestyle not only by an appeal of the atomized individuals and government regulation but also by the functioning of society as an additional factor. However, he considered public opinion to be ambiguous. On the one hand, it can inhibit and limit the weaker groups’ viewpoint expressing, as it was described in Vickers’ â€Å"Religious discrimination in the workplace† (2010). At the same time, Mill believes that public opinion can be formed and improved during the ongoing free discussion, which involves intelligent individuals. On the other hand, as public de bates are open and free, they lead to prejudice and error correction, though it does not lead us in the direction of a single truth. Free discussion at least allows expressing different perspectives and points of view to their supporters and opponents more clearly.Utilitarianism considers personal freedom, dignity, honesty, and social well-being among the central and most important values. It protects freedom of speech, freedom of the press because considers them to be socially desirable qualities.